Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 +12887%
4.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2013
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GK110
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GK110-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy