ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 220W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2475MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
7128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
+110775%
35.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2024
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
504.2GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
40
Shading Units
7168
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
198.0 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
554.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.48 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.48 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
554.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
220W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
AD104
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
AD104-350-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
