ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 32GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5090 D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 575W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2407MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
21720 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 5090 D
+327400%
104.8 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2025
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 50
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2017 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2407 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR7
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1.79TB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
170
40
Shading Units
21760
4
TMUs
680
4
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
680
-
RT Cores
170
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
423.6 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1637 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
104.8 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.8 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.637 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
575W
200 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GB202
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
92.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
750 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
10.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
