ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R7 250E
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250E to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 55W)
AMD Radeon R7 250E 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250E
+2459%
0.819 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2013
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
819.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
51.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Cape Verde
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
