ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs ATI Radeon X1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
40 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
-
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
RV516
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
55 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0
