ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 128MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
40 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (32W vs 49W)
ATI Radeon X800 GTO 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R400 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
350 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
-
4
TMUs
12
4
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
49W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
R423
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
R423 GTO
TeraScale
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.16 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
289 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
-
