ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+71900%
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
40
Shading Units
5120
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
AD104
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
