ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA T1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
T1000
+7712%
2.5 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
40
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
TU117
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
