Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R9 290

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290 +15053%
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2013
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Hawaii
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy