ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 32W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
T400
+3318%
1.094 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
40
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
TU117
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
