ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe
+5323%
4.339 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
80
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GA107
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
Unknown
59 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
