ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs Intel Arc Pro A60
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 130W)
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1968 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60
+10396%
8.397 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2023
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.79 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.397 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
17W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
DG2-256
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
11.5 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
269 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
