ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (17W vs 73W)
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
40 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
+80%
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
120
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
17W
TDP
73W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
RV630
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
