ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
+1150%
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
800
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
RV770
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
