ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (17W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
+77%
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
80
Shading Units
16
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
17W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GT218
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
