ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
+3461%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jul 2020
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
80
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
TU116
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
