ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 300W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1019MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1456 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 690
+3812%
3.13 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2012
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1536
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GK104
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
