ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950
+2181%
1.825 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1024 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.02 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.825 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GM206
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
GM206-250-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
