ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 215W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2080
+12487%
10.07 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Sep 2018
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1515 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
46
80
Shading Units
2944
8
TMUs
184
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
368
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
109.4 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
314.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.14 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.07 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
314.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
215W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
TU104
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
TU104-400A-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
