ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA NVS 810
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
Lower TDP (17W vs 68W)
NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1033MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
NVS 810
+1222%
1.058 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
902 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
68W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GM107
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
