ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
19376 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+102050%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2024
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
288GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
19456
8
TMUs
1216
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
153 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
N/A
