ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4016 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro SSG
+15262%
12.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2017
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Vega 10
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
