ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R7 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Lower TDP (17W vs 55W)
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
+796%
0.717 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
