ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R7 250X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 80W)
AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250X
+1420%
1.216 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
640
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
