ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R7 265
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
944 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
+2267%
1.894 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
