ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 560
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon RX 560 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1275MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
944 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560
+3163%
2.611 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Apr 2017
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1175 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.40 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
81.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.611 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.611 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
163.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Polaris 21
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XT
(215-0908004)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
3 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
