Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 580 OEM

ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 580 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 580 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon RX 580 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 580 OEM +7192%
5.834 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2016
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
1
Compute Units
36
80
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 XT (215-0876184)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Board Design

17W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy