ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 107W)
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2815MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.9GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
944 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6500 XT
+7106%
5.765 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2815 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2248 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
143.9GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
90.08 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
180.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
11.53 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.765 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
107W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Navi 24
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XT
(215-135000006)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
