ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4528 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6800 XT
+25825%
20.74 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2020
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
72
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
4608
8
TMUs
288
4
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
288.0 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
648.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
41.47 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.74 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1296 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Navi 21
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XT
(215-121000177)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
