ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
5040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+28700%
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
80
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
AD104
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
