Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel UHD Graphics 610

AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel UHD Graphics 610

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 610 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
288 additional rendering cores
Intel UHD Graphics 610 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1050MHz vs 905MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +244%
0.695 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 610
0.202 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2020
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
350 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
96
24
TMUs
12
8
ROPs
2
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
403.2 GFLOPS
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
201.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Comet Lake GT1
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
14 nm+++
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

65W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy