Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel HD Graphics 4200

AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel HD Graphics 4200

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (905MHz vs 850MHz)
224 additional rendering cores
Intel HD Graphics 4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (4W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300 +155%
0.695 TFLOPS
HD Graphics 4200
0.272 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2013
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
200 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
850 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
160
24
TMUs
20
8
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.700 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
272.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
68.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
4W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Haswell GT2
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 7.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
22 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy