AMD FirePro A320 vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock955MHz
336 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro A320
+705%
0.733 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2010
Trinity
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Base Clock
-
955 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
22.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
733.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Devastator
GPU Name
C89
A320
GPU Variant
MCP89
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
-
32 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
