Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

AMD FirePro D300 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1240 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300 +6700%
2.176 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
40
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV620
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy