Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (150W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +83%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
274W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tahiti
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy