Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs ATI Radeon HD 3750

AMD FirePro D300 vs ATI Radeon HD 3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 22.18GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300 +1039%
2.176 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3750
0.191 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
693 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
22.18GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
120
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.184 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.368 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
191.0 GFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV635
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
RV635 PRO (215-0682008)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy