Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon R9 390X

AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon R9 390X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 390X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 390X +171%
5.914 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
184.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.914 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
739.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Grenada
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Grenada XT (215-0880004)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy