Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +958%
23.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
1280
Shading Units
5120
80
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
AD104
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy