Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D500 vs Intel Arc A310

AMD FirePro D500 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
2.227 TFLOPS
Arc A310 +20%
2.688 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

24
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
768
96
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
DG2-128
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net