Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D500 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD FirePro D500 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 243.8GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
2.227 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +467%
12.63 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Sep 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

24
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
1536
Shading Units
4480
96
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GA100
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net