AMD FirePro D500 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1456 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 274W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
+2683%
2.227 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
24
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
80
96
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
274W
TDP
17W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Cedar
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
