AMD FirePro D500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (80W vs 274W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
2.227 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
+27%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Jul 2020
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
24
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1536
Shading Units
896
96
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
274W
TDP
80W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
TU116
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
