AMD FirePro D500 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 243.8GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 274W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
2.227 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+438%
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
24
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1536
Shading Units
2816
96
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
274W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
AD107
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
