AMD FirePro M2000 vs AMD Radeon E9172 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon E9172 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 35W)
AMD Radeon E9172 MXM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Radeon E9172 MXM
+160%
1.248 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Oct 2017
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1124 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
12.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Turks
GPU Name
Lexa
Turks GL
GPU Variant
E9170
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
