AMD FirePro M3100 vs Intel Arc A350M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 64% (1150MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M3100
0.537 TFLOPS
Arc A350M
+228%
1.766 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
700 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
16.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Mars
GPU Name
DG2-128
Mars M2 LP
(216-0842009)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6
