Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

AMD FirePro M3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 71% (1200MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M3100
0.537 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +357%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

650 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
700 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
16.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Mars
GPU Name
TU117
Mars M2 LP (216-0842009)
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy