AMD FirePro M3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M3100 's Advantages
Boost Clock700MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
360 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M3100
+913%
0.537 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320M
0.053 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2010
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Base Clock
-
700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
384
Shading Units
24
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
16.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
537.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
23W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Mars
GPU Name
GT216
Mars M2 LP
(216-0842009)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.1
