AMD FirePro M3100 vs NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 and 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 189% (2025MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M3100
0.537 TFLOPS
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
+1444%
8.294 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
700 MHz
Boost Clock
2025 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.80 GPixel/s
16.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.294 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
129.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Mars
GPU Name
AD107
Mars M2 LP
(216-0842009)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7
