AMD FirePro M3900 vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
160
Shading Units
96
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
6.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Seymour
GPU Name
GF117
Seymour GL
GPU Variant
N13M-NS1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
