Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M4100 vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

AMD FirePro M4100 vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M4100 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M4100
0.514 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM +1035%
5.834 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Sep 2016
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.360 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
16.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
514.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
32.16 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Mars
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Mars M2 PRO/LP (216-0842009)
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy